1031 Exchange Eligibility Seattle WA

Courts that have analyzed 1031 exchange eligibility of a property have generally concluded that the requirements are met if the property is held “primarily for investment.” In other words, if there is objective evidence that the taxpayer’s primary motive is to hold the property for investment, then limited use of the property by the taxpayer for personal enjoyment will not destroy the investment character of the property.

Local Companies

Common Ground
(206) 461-4500
419 Occidental Ave. S Suite., 201
Seattle, WA
Sound Counsel Realty
(206) 347-9445
701 5th Ave., Suite 4200
Seattle, WA
Hines GS Properties, Inc.
(206) 621-9172
800 5th Ave.,
Seattle, WA
KeyCorp Leasing
(206) 684-6229
700 5th Ave.
Seattle, WA
Martin Selig Real Estate
(206) 467-7600
1000 2nd Ave.,
Seattle, WA
Martin Smith Inc
(206) 682-3300
83 S. King St.,
Seattle, WA
Metzler North America
(206) 623-2700
700 Fifth Ave., 61st floor
Seattle, WA
Northwest Building Corporation
(206) 464-5252
801 2nd Ave.,
Seattle, WA
Samis Land Company
(206) 622-3363
208 James St,
Seattle, WA
The Maritime Corporation
(206) 622-0485
911 Western Ave. Rm 500
Seattle, WA

provided by:




Courts that have analyzed 1031 exchange eligibility of a property have generally concluded that the requirements are met if the property is held “primarily for investment.” Internal Revenue Code Section 1031(a) provides that:

"[n]o gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment if such property is exchanged solely for property of like kind which is to be held either for productive use in a trade or business or for investment" (emphasis added)

In other words, if there is objective evidence that the taxpayer’s primary motive is to hold the property for investment, then limited use of the property by the taxpayer for personal enjoyment will not destroy the investment character of the property.

 

Difficulties in determining intent

It is easy to frame the issue, but it is often difficult to determine whether the taxpayer’s investment intent dominates an intent to hold for personal use. This is especially true when the taxpayer holds a vacation property and uses it from time to time. The practical difficulty is compounded by the IRS's limited guidance concerning the requirements to prove that the property is held for investment. A recent Treasury Inspector General Audit report (“TIGA”) pertaining to the IRS’s enforcement of 1031 exchanges was critical of the IRS for its failure to provide guidance to taxpayers, thereby leaving unrebutted the claims of some promoters that vacation properties and second homes were generally eligible for exchange.

Click here to read the rest of the article.

NuWire Investor is an online publication that offers quality information about alternative investments such as real estate, commodities and franchises.

Author: Scott Saunders
Copyright © NuWire Investor and NuWire, Inc 2007. All rights reserved. NuWire Investor material may not be copied, reproduced, redistributed, published or modified without the prior express written consent of NuWire, Inc.

Featured Local Company

Common Ground

(206) 461-4500
419 Occidental Ave. S Suite., 201
Seattle, WA
http://www.commongroundwa.org/