Heterogeneous Semiconductors Extending CMOS Wichita KS

Research groups are stepping up efforts in heterogeneous semiconductors as a way of extending CMOS,...

Local Companies

Price Bros Equipment Co
(316) 265-9577
619 S Washington St
Wichita, KS
Concrete Accessories Company
(316) 263-7251
1040 S West St
Wichita, KS
GT MidWest
(316) 943-2171
2202 S West St
Wichita, KS
Golden Plains Lumber Lc
(316) 858-1327
2205 W Harry St
Wichita, KS
Grainger Industrial Supply
(316) 945-5101
1920 S West St
Wichita, KS
Gallery Expressions Fisher Lumber
(316) 721-1228
7355 W Taft St
Wichita, KS
Kansas Wholesale Lumber Co Inc
(316) 831-9991
2356 N Richmond St
Wichita, KS
Kansas Concrete Cutting
(316) 832-1580
3410 N Ohio St
Wichita, KS
Fastenal Co
(316) 832-0961
1635 E 37th St N
Wichita, KS
A C Houston Lumber
(316) 636-9990
1313 N Webb Rd
Wichita, KS

provided by: Semiconductor International

Research groups are stepping up efforts in heterogeneous semiconductors as a way of extending CMOS, using epitaxial techniques to deposit materials with higher mobilities than silicon. Heterogeneous devices may be formed on silicon wafers, incorporating, for example, germanium in the pFETs and III-V materials in the nFETs, including GaAs, InGaAs or InSb.

Sematech (Austin, Texas) has quietly increased its heterogeneous device activities, according to Raj Jammy, front-end program manager for the organization. Aixtron Inc. (Sunnyvale, Calif.) and Sematech co-sponsored a workshop on the topic coinciding with the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) in December.

Jammy said he believes heterostructures could replace silicon transistors on perhaps 10% of the devices in a chip in the critical circuits where performance would be limited by silicon transistors. "The idea is not to replace silicon as a starting material. Companies could use [heterogeneous devices] selectively, creating an ultrathin film just in the channel regions, where you want the performance boost to come from. If we use them selectively, we don't have to switch to III-V wafers."

The impetus for the research comes as performance gains in silicon become more difficult to come by. Scaling to smaller device dimensions alone doesn't guarantee performance gains. Dimitri Antoniadis, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, Cambridge, Mass.) and director of the multi-university Focus Center for Materials, Structures and Devices (MSD), said that brute scaling of today's silicon devices may result in performance degradation rather than performance gains. His simulations show capacitance, measured at the first-level metal, is increasing and not being compensated by increased velocity of the carriers.

"Basically, the model shows that from 65 to 45 there is some gain but, by the 32 nm node, there may be none, or may even scale in reverse," Antoniadis said. "By that, we mean 32 nm transistor performance may be lower than 45 nm, though we need to update the model on the basis of what Intel and other companies present. Then we may have a better idea."

The challenges with silicon scaling, Antoniadis said, are external resistance at the source and drain regions and an increasing capacitance load for transistors with a dense contacted pitch. Looking only at gate capacitance doesn't provide an accurate picture when parasitic capacitance is becoming a more important factor, he added.

In a presentation at IEDM, MIT professor Jesús del Alamo said the 15 nm generation coming in 2013 "might be the last on silicon. Beyond that, we have to take the advantages of silicon substrates and bring in new materials."

At that point, III-V devices on silicon substrates may compete with transistors incorporating carbon nanotubes and nanowires. Del Alamo said the advantages of III-V nFETs are well-known, including much higher electron transport properties and good reliability. However, III-V materials have bandgaps that "in general, are worse than silicon." Also, the hole mobilities "in general, tend to be worse than silicon."

That is leading researchers at Sematech (Austin, Texas) and elsewhere to examine the advantages of combining III-V-based nFETs and germanium-based pFETs. Germanium transistors excel at hole transport, but are weak in electron mobility.

Jammy, an IBM (Fishkill, N.Y.) assignee to Sematech, said a major challenge is the lattice mismatches that exist between silicon, germanium and the various non-silicon materials. "Dislocations are the big issue, but we have shown we can control that very nicely. In general, we are shooting for something in the low e11 dislocations, and we can demonstrate that now."

Using epitaxial deposition, it may be practical to deposit ultrathin layers of germanium on top of silicon, creating a buffer on which one of the III-V materials could be deposited. Because germanium would be present as a buffer for the nFETs, that would make it easier to create pFETs using germanium as the channel material.



author: David Lammers, News Editor

Semiconductor International. Copyright © 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Featured Local Company

Price Bros Equipment Co

(316) 265-9577
619 S Washington St
Wichita, KS